IMPORTANT CONTACT INFORMATION

A line of waste water trucks waiting to dump their contents in to an injection well.

Important Project Contacts:
Clink the highlighted links below to access individual email or web address

ATTENTION - The ONLY time you will be able to voice your opinion about this project is coming up. Tuesday March 15th - the zoning and building committee will receive the results from 3 independent contractors and decide whether or not to send this project to the county commissioners. AGAIN

TUESDAY, MARCH 15 7:00
231 Ensign (the old courthouse building)
you have to enter the building through the back and take the elevator to the bottom floor to get in

Morgan County Planning and Zoning - Administrator
213 Ensign Street
Fort Morgan, CO 80701
970-542-3526

Morgan County Assessor's Office
231 Ensign St
Fort Morgan, CO 80701
970-542-3512

231 Ensign
Fort Morgan, CO 80701
970-542-3526

Waste Water Injection Well Project Manager - Tetra Tech
Project Engineer has asked that her professional contact information related to this project be removed from this site.


Lee Robinson - Vice President
Windy Hill Water Operations, LLC #10589
PO Box 18283
Denver, CO 80218
303-355-3242

Main Office
1120 Lincoln Street, Suite 801
Denver, CO 80203
303-894-2100
Complaint Line - 888-235-1101

Colorado State University
430 North College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80524

Dale Colerick - Director of Public Works
600 Edison Street
Brush, CO 80723
970-842-5001

If you would like to add an article of interest or additional contact information please contact me:

Brush, CO

Thursday, March 3, 2016

PERMIT WITHDRAWN



Late last, March 2nd according to John Crosthwait of the Morgan County Planning and Zoning Department - Windy Hill has withdrawn their permit to operate a waste water injection well in Brush.  The withdrawal was sent by Windy Hill attorneys and can be accessed from John's office in the old Morgan County courthouse if you would like to view it.  I of course will be getting a copy and will add it to this blog.

The reasons for the withdrawal are not spelled out according to Mr Crosthwait.  We will all need to be vigilant about this company and this particular site in the event a new permit is filed - which could happen.  Today though I am going to consider this a small victory and have a beautiful clear glass of water.  Cheers!!

This site will remain operational in order to stay on top of F Lee Robinson and his company Windy Hill and any future plans for the well that is in place near Hwy 71 and Morgan County Road Q.

Monday, February 29, 2016

Convenient Truth


The Dark purple in this map represents active injections wells in Weld County and along the front range.  Weld County and the surrounding areas are producing enormous amounts of waste water and have run out of places to dispose of it.  Morgan County is the next target - look at the map.

Thursday, February 11, 2016

MEETING - March 7:00 pm

Please plan to attend the Morgan County Planning and Building meeting on, Tuesday  March 15th at 7:00 in the old fort Morgan Courthouse at 231 Ensign in Fort Morgan

You have to enter through the back hallway and take the elevator to the bottom floor to get to the assembly room.  The project attorneys, engineers and vice president will be there.  If this project is approved it will automatically be sent to the three county commissioners who simply approve or deny the permit.

There is no democratic process or voting for this project

Traffic Pattern Changes


The CDOT evaluation states this intersection will be just a small jut on highway 34.  Consider though traffic going east and west is going at highway speed including trucks already utilizing this route to get from I76 to Highway 71 south.  Stop signs are designated  on Road 29 and highway 71.  See the long coal train in the background?  That is because the tracks are frequented by long slow moving coal trains blocking road 29.  When coal trains block road 29 - 1 minute earlier or later that same train then blocks hwy 34 causing traffic to back up for blocks.   Add a few school bus routes, a few rural mail carriers and lets say an auction that draws hundreds of people to that very corner at least twice a month and remember 1 truck every 4 minutes.  Only 850 feet of this project are scheduled for modification or improvement.



Monday, February 8, 2016

25,000 barrels ever day

25000 every single day - that is the amount of waste that could be injected in to this well during phase three.  

Regulators order reduced injection well volumes after quakes 





OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — Operators of 27 oil and natural gas wastewater disposal wells in northwest Oklahoma must reduce volume due to the swarm of moderate earthquakes in the past week, state regulators said Wednesday.
The implementation of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission's plan calls for changes in the operation of wells about 100 miles northwest of Oklahoma City near Fairview. The commission said the total reduction in wastewater injection volume will be 54,859 barrels daily — or about 2.3 million gallons — a drop of about 18 percent.
Last week, a series of earthquakes occurred in the Fairview area, which is about 60 miles from the Kansas state line, but there were no reports of significant damage or injuries. The U.S. Geological Survey said it recorded a magnitude 4.7 earthquake on Jan. 6 about 20 miles from Fairview. Less than a minute later, a magnitude 4.8 quake about a half-mile away. A magnitude 4.0 quake was recorded Jan. 7 with a second one of the same magnitude felt about 12 hours later.
The plan is part of an "ongoing process," said Tim Baker, the director of the commission's Oil and Gas Conservation Division, adding that other changes may be ordere
"The data available indicates that a much larger approach to the earthquakes in that entire part of northwestern Oklahoma is needed, and we have been working on such a plan," Baker said.
The Oklahoma Geological Survey has said it is "very likely" that most earthquakes are triggered by the subsurface injection of wastewater from the drilling operations.
Baker said the agency also believes power outages that accompanied a winter storm that dropped ice and snow over the area may have created a higher potential risk of earthquakes because of the "tremendous volume of produced water being disposed" once the wells came back online. He said the agency recommends that production volumes be staged or phased in following power outages.
The 27 disposal wells involved in the directive are operated by eight different companies, according to information provided by the commission. Agency spokesman Matt Skinner said none of the operators have raised objections to the new guidelines.
The directive was issued a day after a class-action lawsuit was filed by residents in Logan County, about 35 miles north of Oklahoma City. The lawsuit alleges that injection wells have induced earthquakes in the area.
The lawsuit alleges that one homeowner, Lisa Griggs of Guthrie, has experienced more than 100 earthquakes of magnitude 3.0 or greater in the past two years and that multiple quakes of magnitude 4.0 damaged her home in 2014.
Robin Greenwald, head of the Environmental, Toxic Tort & Consumer Protection litigation unit of the New York City law firm Weitz & Luxenberg, said the lawsuit "seeks redress for the damage these earthquakes and those before them have caused."
"Despite compelling evidence, these companies continue to inject wastewater into wells at an alarming rate, all the while knowing that their activities are jeopardizing residents' homes and livelihoods," Greenwald said.

Saturday, February 6, 2016

Fresh Water Or Frack Water?

The Environmental Protection Agency announced a Consent Agreement Thursday with Exco Resources, which operates a deep injection well in Bell Township, Clearfield County. Deep well injection sites are used to dispose of frack waste water by shooting the liquid deep into the ground at high pressure. The Clearfield County well had failed sometime in early April, 2011, according to a release issued by the EPA. But the company continued to inject the frack fluid until August, without notifying the EPA.
The EPA ordered Exco Resources to halt injections at the site. The agency fined Exco $159,624 for the violation, under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Exco Resources also needs to re-work its well disposal site, and gain approval from the EPA. Another deep injection well has been proposed for Clearfield County. State Rep. Camille George has introduced a bill that would put a two-year moratorium on any new wells in the state.

Friday, February 5, 2016

Complete Letter to the Editor - Fort Morgan Times

Dear Editor:

In regard to the article printed in the Fort Morgan Times pertaining to the proposed Sandy Hill water treatment facility, I have several questions and concerns and I ask that Morgan County residents examine these as well.  

I don’t consider myself either pro- or anti- gas and oil industry.  I do consider the options – safe, sound, and scientific energy.  I had the opportunity to send the specs for this project to a ground water engineer from a large, prestigious engineering firm in Centennial, CO.  Her assessment of the proposed project was, as she stated, “a typical injection well used frequently in the oil and gas industry” -  typical construction, monitoring, etc.  That being said, the next sentence in her assessment stated that if this project was being built near her home she would be, again in her words, “less than thrilled”.   Several key experts have gone on record to acknowledge that the idea that injection is safe rests on science that has not kept pace with reality, and that oversight is overwhelmed and inefficient. Historically, scientists and environmental officials have assumed that deep layers of rock beneath the earth would safely entomb toxins and waste for millennium.  However, there are now growing signs that they were mistaken.

The largest and most pressing issue is that of safety.  Contamination of groundwater aquifers is a concern in several states, including Colorado.  Colorado State University started a monitoring program with real time data reported on their website (http://waterwatch.colostate.edu)  If anything is detected, the company injecting waste water is required to report it.  There is no such mention of utilizing this tool, or any tool in real time, for this project.   The company is only required to test water samples every 5 years.  Documented leaking of previously sound wells has occurred in many states, most notably Oklahoma, Louisiana and Florida.  Don't be fooled by project engineers calling the waste saltwater or brine; it has also been shown to contain cancer causing ingredients such as benzene in similar projects.

Concerns also include seismic activity.   This injection well does document the fact that there are no known faults near the site and that seismic activity is very low.  Similar documentation was also noted prior to permits for projects near injection wells in Oklahoma and our neighboring Weld County - both of these areas documented large amounts of seismic activity or earthquakes strong enough to be felt by people in nearby towns and cities after injection wells or a series of wells were drilled.  One hydrogeologist who spoke in 2012 stated, “There is no certainty in all of this, and whoever tells you the opposite is not telling the truth.  The oil and gas industry is changing the underground system with pressure and water and fracturing and we have no idea how it will behave”.  

Additionally, we only have to look at the effects of the changes on Weld County Road 49 between Greeley and Kersey to see a profound traffic pattern changes.   What was once a primarily county ag road has turned into a major truck corridor.  Keensburg officials have encouraged local school districts to eliminate bus routes along this road turned interstate, as fast moving waste water trucks have little time to react to people, wildlife or vehicles pulling out from adjacent county roads.  There is absolutely no room to walk, run or bike on this road at this time, and no proposal to improve all but 850 feet of the truck route near the site. In the recent Fort Morgan times a figure of 200 trucks daily was quoted.  If you look at the report submitted with this project, in exhibit T on page 8 there is information that states at its peak, this project can have up to 400 trucks daily toting waste water to and from the facility.   Do the math:  400 daily one way trips equals 16 trucks an hour, or one truck rambling by every 4 minutes.  There is no mention in the report of any consideration given to multiple train delays and/or slow moving ag related traffic along the route.  There is no mention given to rural post office delivery or school bus routes.  There is no mention of what route these trucks will take if the road is closed related to flooding or inclement weather.  Exhibit T briefly mentions the “short jog on Highway 34 to get to Highway 71”.   That intersection can be precarious with traffic coming from 4 different directions and with delays related to already existing truck traffic coming from Interstate 76 attempting to turn on to Highway 71 Not one but two railroad crossings and frequent lengthy coal train traffic only add to the problem at that intersection.

Lastly, I want to ask the question:  how is this going to benefit Morgan County?  The report states that the site itself can employee six to possibly 20 employees.  If they live in Morgan County possibly a small kick back.   So in short, Weld County and Logan County are harvesting natural gas and oil - and the residents of those counties are reaping the rewards with school improvements, safer roads, stronger law enforcement, new emergency management systems and increased government staffing.  Both counties have run out of room to store waste water but that doesn't stop them from continuing to harvest the gas and oil, because it creates a great deal of revenue.  This is not that kind of project.  Truckers won’t be stopping for lunch or banking at the local branch.  They won’t be filling up their tanks or moving their families to Morgan County.  In the meantime, I see countless articles about budget cuts for local schools and recreational activities, and businesses that are forced to close in Morgan County.  Are we really going to allow this project to move forward in the words of Tetratech  company vice president Lee Robinson “with the hopes that someday somewhere several people will move to Morgan County if the county has a water source they can use for industrial purposes”?  When I ask this question I think there must be something I am missing or misunderstanding.  Why is this even an option? I contacted the project engineer from Tetra Tech, who stated  “”There will be financial incentives for the county."  That doesn't sound like a sound business plan for Morgan County.

John Croswait and the Morgan County Planning and Zoning Department -take pause.  Let’s get all the facts.  Let’s notify those who own homes, land and businesses along the truck route, because it’s the right thing to do.  Lets see the contingency plan when the truck route is closed.  Instead of issuing a permit and a go-ahead for this project as a matter of routine, let’s utilize some forward thinking and ask the pertinent questions from the information above.  I understand that most of the permits for this project have already been obtained and it is now county planning and zoning who will decide on this proposal – unbelievably, a project of this magnitude doesn't require a public vote.  If you think it’s not in your backyard because you don't live in or around Brush think again.  My fear, and I hope I am mistaken, is that Morgan County could become the dumping ground for trucks and toxic waste with injection wells dotted all over our beautiful, quiet, and serene county.  All it takes is a few landowners who are willing to sell to anyone for any reason if the price is right.  If the board approves this injection  well there is no reason to believe there won’t be many more that spring up sooner than later- possibly in your backyard.

If you would like a forum for information sharing, important community and project contact information or pertinent research articles please go to brushtroubledwaters,blogspot.com

Sincerely, 

Roxanne Cook